Matt Tsuki

Warning: this WORLD occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors).

Fan Art :: Wallpapers :: eCards

Buttercup Festival :: xkcd :: A Softer World

Critics United

Tumblr

Art Trades :: CLOSED

Requests :: CLOSED

Cruse

Priorities in your life: 1: PRIDE 2: LOVE 3: FAMILY 4: MONEY 5: CAREER domesticated implies your own personality. curious implies personality of your partner. round implies the personality of your ...

Read the full post »

You the reader

What's your name? Matt Tsuki Age? Nineteen going on twenty What country do you live in? Canada! That big place next to the U.S. of A. Do you like it? I love it until it snows. Then we fight. Wh...

Read the full post »

Concentric Landmarks

My name is Matt Tsuki, and I am having fish and chips for dinner

Publicity stunts undertaken by press agent Jim Moran, 1938-1959:
•Sold a refrigerator to an Eskimo in Alaska
•Threw eggs at an electric fan
•Changed horses in midstream in a Nevada river
•Sought a needle in a haystack (for 10 days)
•Walked a bull through a New York china shop
•Hatched an ostrich egg (by sitting on it for 19 days)
•Opened a Washington embassy for a mythical country
By the 1950s the era of the flamboyant stunt was ending, and authorities put a stop to Moran’s more ambitious schemes. He said, “It’s a sad day for American capitalism when a man can’t fly a midget on a kite over Central Park.”

A whimsical traveler on one of the main trails in the State of Georgia painted, on a large rock, the words, ‘Turn Me Over.’ Other travelers heaved and struggled to turn the rock over. On the underside of it they found painted, ‘Now Turn Me Back That I May Fool Another.’
– H. Allen Smith, The Compleat Practical Joker, 1953

In the days before chess clocks, a player might wait for hours while his opponent decided on a move.
Morphy’s companion Frederick Milnes Edge remarked that “[József] Szén was so frightfully slow, even in ordinary games, that he would have worn out 200 francs’ worth of his opponent’s pantaloons before the match was half through.”
The most notorious slowpoke in England was Elijah “The Bristol Sloth” Williams: In the fourth game of his London match against Henry Thomas Buckle in 1851, Williams lavished such exquisite care on his 25th move that Buckle had time to write two chapters of his History of Civilization.
Buckle won. “The slowness of genius is hard to bear,” he said, “but the slowness of mediocrity is intolerable.”

Epitaph of the eminent barrister Sir John Strange:
Here lies an honest lawyer,–
that is Strange.
From Epitaphiana: or, The Curiosities of Churchyard Literature, 1873.

When German physicist Walther Nernst learned that his cowshed was warm because of the cows’ metabolic activity, he resolved to sell them and invest in carp. A thinking man, he said, cultivates animals that are in thermodynamic equilibrium with their surroundings and does not waste his money in heating the universe.

semiopathy
n. the tendency to read humorously inappropriate meanings into signs

Futility Closet

Aesthetics

Asethetics is the philosophy of art.

The first important question is: What is art? An ordinary kitchen table is presumably not a work of art, but Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa is. Philosophers call this the problems of the ontology of art- What it is about an object that makes it art?

One possible answer is that art is beautiful. But not all beautiful things are art. Sunsets, lanscapes, and certain people are beautiful but are not works of art. Anouther possible answer is that art represents something or conveys a message. However, the footage from a security camrea represents something- namely, the people it records- but that footage is not art. Likewise, sentences of English convey a message, but that does not mean that all sentences of English are artworks, though some may be.

Anouther important question in philosophical aesthetics is: What are we saying when we evaluate art? If we say of some painting "This is beautiful," or "This is good art," are we just saying that we like the painting or that it pleases us? If so, one observer may say a painting is beautiful, while anouther says it is ugly without disagreeing. All the first statement means is that the painting pleased the first observer, while all the second statement means is that it did not please the second observer. Neither statement alleges any general truth about the painting. The difficult with this approach is that appears to leave no room for arguing, or reasoning, about the value of art. It also leaves no room for the concept of taste, the idea that some people are better able to than others to determine what is good art and why.

Other questions in aesthetics include: What is a genre? What makes something a novel rather than a long poem? Aestheticians also consider: What is the purpose of art? What is valuable about art, and why should we care about it?

the Intellectual Devotional
copyright 2oo6 by TID Volumes, LLC
David S. Kidder & Noah D. Oppenheim

You need to click here. NOW

ParisGun
::Fan art::

External Image External Image External Image

External Image

Enough said folks.


Go share some love'en